LakeMX237 SuperCross Cycling Shoe - Men's

Stand out.

Cyclocross season is the time to break free of strict roadie kit rules and roll up to the start line with some flashy personality, and there's no better way to cap off a fluoro kit than with a pair of Lake's MX237 SuperCross Men's Cycling Shoes. With styling that seems reminiscent of our favorite old-school baseball spikes, these shoes are clamoring to be accompanied by a rad pair of knee socks and a perfectly proportioned long-sleeved skinsuit to rocket off the line for the hole shot and beyond. They're not just style though, as Lake also packs them with all the carbon-soled, hard-wearing, and highly adjustable features we expect from race-worthy fare, with the addition of aggressive toe spikes for an extra bit of grippy oomph when the race promoter has you scrambling out of a muddy creek bed or climbing a wall of grassy stairs.

  • A race-worthy cyclocross shoe with stylish flair
  • Stiff carbon fiber sole efficiently transfers watts to the pedals
  • Lugged outsole and toe spikes conspire for grippy purchase off the bike
  • Abrasion resistant leather upper with mesh panels for ventilation
  • Dual Boa closures dial in the fit with streamlined precision
  • Reviews
  • Q & A

Initial Impression

  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions
  • Fit: True to size
  • Size Bought: 12

I've spent about 15 years as a wrench in various shops, and have had the luxury of trying on many different shoes before purchasing, so buying unfamiliar shoes on line is always sketchy. That said, it was time to purchase a new pair as my Sidi's fell victim to my new puppy. I didn't like the reviews I saw with Sidi's new stuff so I decided to look at other options. Lake stood out, specifically the Supercross. Great reviews and, damn, they look pretty rad. They checked all the boxes for cyclocross, MTB, etc., but how was the fit? Well, I'll just say that out of the box, these shoes are a dream. They blow away any Sidi shoe I've ever had, and I've had quite a few. The only other shoe that came close to fit were some old Carnacs from years ago. The Boa retention system is awesome. Plenty of room in the toebox and ample volume for my not-so-narrow feet. I've only put about 70km in these so far, so I can't yet speak for longevity, but the leather they use seems pretty rugged. Nice stiff carbon sole without any hotsopts. Great shoe. I'm now a Lake convert.

Initial Impression

Not as comfortable as the standard MX237

  • Familiarity: I returned this product before using it
  • Fit: True to size
  • Size Bought: 47 (use Lake's fit guide on their website)

My first pair of the standard MX237 was showing some wear so I thought I would "upgrade" to the MX237 Supercross. The Supercross looks awesome and the tough leather sounds great in theory, but the comfort really drops compared to the standard MX237. I had issues with the top edge of the buckle/strap cutting into the front of my ankle through the very top edge of the tongue. Check the photo for clarification of the buckle/strap issue. The buckle/strap isn't as pliable as the leather on the standard MX237 and it cuts into my ankle. The standard leather moves when needed and is much better. This the only thing I could find wrong with the shoe. It may be much better on someone with a different foot shape than mine. It could also be something that breaks in very quickly and gets comfortable. But, I wasn't willing to check and see after knowing how comfortable the standard MX237 was.

I tried the MX237 Supercross as well (been riding a Giro shoe before). I also noticed that it was uncomfortable at the top edge where it met my ankle - and has to return it for that reason. Just not comfortable with that cutting into my ankle.

Shawn, how long did the standard MX237's last before they got to the point where you had to replace them? Apart from this rubbing issue how was the comfort of this material compared to the standard leather? It seems much stiffer so does the lack of stretch and movement make for the overall comfort to be worse as well? Thanks.