Wednesday, March 14 2007, 03:15 PM
now i have an uncontrollable urge for thin mints. thanks a lot.
Wednesday, March 14 2007, 01:59 PM
shred, i agree. the californians can all go back there and continue f*cking up their state instead of f*cking up ours.
except for you, GA. you can stay.
Wednesday, March 14 2007, 12:28 AM
i know that, but they don't. i told you, i won't buy icebreaker unless it's under $60.
Wednesday, March 14 2007, 12:25 AM
hi Cat! please hit 2K before me. please.
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 11:16 PM
http://www.gear-addicts.com/chat/flashchat.php
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 11:13 PM
damn, that sounds like a pretty sweet area.
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 11:02 PM
luggage on SAC, nothing to do tonight or tomorrow...
time to get ripped and watch Miami Ink.
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 10:36 PM
every serial killer worth their salt know you use a tarp, not a bag....
zviOne
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 09:55 PM
not gonna answer that specifically, but it's well into 4 digits :\
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 06:54 PM
i think TNF is a perfect example of what you're talking about, ice.
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 06:42 PM
my point exactly, ice. most of the people you're preaching to about the evils of spending too much for brand name products... are people who very rarely pay retail for them.
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 06:00 PM
show of hands... how many of you have paid retail (or even close to it) for Smartwool?
Tuesday, March 13 2007, 03:11 PM
http://www.backcountryoutlet.com/outlet/VOX0005/Vox-The-Strubing-Skate-Shoe-Mens
more than $6 cheaper in the outlet.
MountainDoggy
Monday, March 12 2007, 10:10 AM
you're a jackass. maybe i would take you seriously if you actually backed up your reasoning or said anything except "you're dumb". if you have a reason that you disagree with me, that's fine. SAY IT instead of trying to make yourself feel superior by implying that you know so much more than me without actually saying anything intelligent.
one more, and then i'll shut up and go to bed
Monday, March 12 2007, 01:56 AM
sorry, but the fact that someone disagrees with the fact that the main purpose of a site like this is NOT to make money blows my mind. do you really think the people in charge of companies like backcountry, REI, etc. give two shits about making people happy? sure, they offer coupons, have good cust. service, have big sales, give dividends (REI), etc., but these are pretty much only to ensure that customers keep coming back - so they can make more money off of them. SAC is no different. SAC is here so: 1) backcountry can move excess inventory that would otherwise sit in a warehouse taking up space and not generating revenue, and 2) to generate more interest (and subsequently more business) for BC.com and BCO.com.
if you really think it's here to make us happy, you might want to take off the rose-colored glasses.
unless they're Smiths that you bought from SAC. then you can just change the lens.